Expert Guide: 7 Critical Factors for Selecting the Right Mooring Rope for Marine Vessels in 2025

October 11, 2025

Abstract

The selection of an appropriate mooring rope for marine vessels represents a complex decision-making process, grounded in the intersection of material science, engineering principles, and operational safety protocols. This analysis examines the critical factors that govern this selection, moving beyond a superficial assessment of tensile strength to a more nuanced understanding of rope performance in dynamic maritime environments. It investigates the material composition of modern mooring lines, contrasting high-performance synthetic fibers like High-Modulus Polyethylene (HMPE) with traditional options such as polyester and nylon. The discussion extends to the methodologies for calculating load requirements, considering the ship's design parameters and the variable forces exerted by wind, current, and waves. Furthermore, the guide evaluates the significance of environmental resistance, regulatory compliance under frameworks like the OCIMF MEG4 guidelines, and the ergonomic considerations that affect crew safety and efficiency. A holistic economic perspective is adopted through the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) model, demonstrating that long-term value often outweighs initial procurement costs. The final analysis synthesizes these elements, presenting the mooring rope not as an isolated component but as an integral part of a comprehensive vessel mooring system.

Key Takeaways

  • Material science is paramount; HMPE offers superior strength-to-weight ratios over traditional fibers.
  • Calculate Minimum Breaking Load (MBL) based on vessel design and environmental forces.
  • Evaluate resistance to UV, abrasion, and chemicals for operational longevity and safety.
  • Ensuring the right mooring rope for marine vessels requires strict adherence to OCIMF and class society rules.
  • Consider crew safety by selecting lightweight, flexible ropes that minimize snap-back risks.
  • Analyze the Total Cost of Ownership, not just the initial price, for better long-term economy.
  • Verify rope compatibility with existing onboard hardware like winches, fairleads, and shackles.

Table of Contents

1. Understanding Material Science: The Foundation of Rope Performance

The act of choosing a mooring rope for a marine vessel is, at its core, an exercise in applied material science. A rope is not merely a length of twisted or braided fiber; it is an engineered product whose capabilities and limitations are dictated by its molecular structure. To treat this selection as a simple matter of procuring a commodity is to overlook the profound implications that material choice has for the safety of the crew, the integrity of the vessel, and the efficiency of the entire port operation. The historical trajectory of rope technology, from organic fibers to the sophisticated synthetics of 2025, reveals a continuous search for greater strength, durability, and safety. A deep appreciation for the properties of these materials is not an academic indulgence but a practical necessity for any maritime professional.

The Evolution from Natural to Synthetic Fibers

For centuries, the maritime world relied upon natural fibers. Ropes made from manila, sisal, hemp, and cotton were the sinews that held ships to their berths. These materials, born of the earth, possessed a certain character and a known set of behaviors. Sailors understood their heft, their tendency to swell when wet, and their vulnerability to rot and mildew. The strength of these ropes was directly proportional to their size and weight, leading to massive, cumbersome lines that required significant manpower to handle. Their performance was a constant negotiation with nature; a sun-baked rope could lose its suppleness, while a rain-soaked one would grow heavy and stiff, its strength compromised by organic decay.

The mid-20th century heralded a revolution with the introduction of synthetic fibers. Nylon, polyester, and polypropylene emerged from the laboratory, offering capabilities that natural fibers could not match. These new materials were impervious to rot, possessed superior strength-to-weight ratios, and exhibited more consistent and predictable properties. Nylon, for example, introduced a high degree of elasticity, allowing it to absorb shock loads effectively. Polyester offered excellent resistance to ultraviolet (UV) radiation and abrasion with lower stretch. Polypropylene, being less dense than water, provided the unique advantage of floating, simplifying handling in certain situations. This shift was not merely a substitution of one material for another; it fundamentally altered the practice of mooring. It allowed for the development of stronger, lighter, and more durable mooring ropes, which in turn enabled the safe mooring of ever-larger vessels. The transition demanded a new kind of knowledge from mariners, one based not on organic behavior but on the principles of polymer chemistry.

High-Modulus Polyethylene (HMPE): The Modern Standard

Entering the 21st century, the next leap in material science came with the commercialization of high-performance synthetic fibers, most notably High-Modulus Polyethylene (HMPE), often known by trade names like Dyneema® or Spectra®. The arrival of HMPE on the maritime scene can be compared to the introduction of steel in an age of iron. Its properties represent a paradigm shift. On a weight-for-weight basis, HMPE is up to 15 times stronger than steel wire and significantly stronger than conventional synthetic fibers. This remarkable strength originates from its unique molecular structure: extremely long chains of polyethylene molecules are aligned in a parallel orientation, creating a highly crystalline structure that is incredibly efficient at transferring load along the polymer backbone.

The practical consequences of this are immense. An HMPE mooring rope for a marine vessel can have the same tensile strength as a steel wire rope or a polyester rope of much larger diameter and weight. A line that once required a team of sailors and a winch to haul can now be handled by one or two individuals. This reduction in weight and size does not just improve efficiency; it profoundly enhances crew safety. Lighter ropes are easier to manage, reducing the risk of strains, back injuries, and fatigue. Perhaps most significantly, the low-stretch nature of HMPE ropes dramatically reduces the stored energy when under load. This means that in the event of a failure, the violent and often lethal "snap-back" effect associated with high-stretch nylon or old steel wires is virtually eliminated. The rope tends to fall to the ground rather than whipping across the deck. When considering the full lifecycle of a vessel's equipment, the use of HMPE ropes aligns with the same principles of strength and safety seen in high-grade lifting slings and chains used for critical overhead lifts.

Traditional Synthetic Fibers: Polyester, Nylon, and Polypropylene

Despite the advantages of HMPE, traditional synthetic fibers continue to hold a significant place in the maritime industry, often because of their specific properties or economic considerations. Understanding their individual characters is vital for making an informed choice.

Polyester (PET) is the workhorse of the mooring world. Its primary appeal lies in its balanced profile. It boasts high strength, excellent resistance to UV degradation and abrasion, and relatively low stretch compared to nylon. This lower elongation makes it predictable and stable for permanent mooring applications where the vessel must be held in a fixed position with minimal movement. Its good resistance to chemicals and its ability to maintain strength when wet make it a reliable and durable choice. When a vessel requires a combination of strength and stability, polyester ropes function much like heavy-duty ratchet straps do for securing cargo—they hold things firmly in place.

Nylon (Polyamide, PA) is defined by its elasticity. It can elongate significantly—up to 40%—under load before breaking. This property makes it exceptionally good at absorbing shock loads, such as those generated by a vessel surging in heavy swells or passing boat wakes. In dynamic environments where energy absorption is paramount, nylon is an excellent choice for applications like towing or anchoring lines. However, this high stretch is a double-edged sword. It stores a tremendous amount of kinetic energy, making a potential line parting and subsequent snap-back a grave danger. Furthermore, nylon's strength is temporarily reduced by about 10-15% when it becomes wet, a factor that must be accounted for in any safety calculation.

Polypropylene (PP) is the lightweight of the group. Its most notable characteristic is its specific gravity of less than 1.0, which allows it to float on water. This makes PP ropes easy to deploy and retrieve, particularly for tasks like messenger lines or as the primary mooring rope for smaller vessels in calm conditions. However, its advantages are balanced by significant drawbacks. Polypropylene has the lowest strength among common synthetic fibers, poor resistance to UV radiation (it can become brittle and weak with sun exposure unless heavily stabilized), and a low melting point, making it susceptible to damage from friction-generated heat on winches or fairleads. Its use as a primary mooring rope for marine vessels of significant size is generally limited to specific, non-critical applications.

Comparing Key Material Properties: Strength, Elasticity, and Durability

To make a rational decision, one must move from qualitative descriptions to quantitative comparisons. The choice of a mooring rope for a marine vessel is not a matter of opinion but of matching engineering data to operational requirements. The table below presents a simplified comparison of the key materials used in mooring applications, including a reference to steel wire for context. This data helps to illustrate the trade-offs involved in selecting the right material.

Property HMPE Polyester Nylon (Polyamide) Polypropylene Steel Wire Rope
Strength-to-Weight Ratio Highest High High Medium Low
Elongation at Break Very Low (3-4%) Low (10-15%) High (30-40%) Medium (15-25%) Very Low (<1%)
Abrasion Resistance Good to Excellent Excellent Good Fair to Poor Poor (internal)
UV Resistance Excellent Excellent Good Fair to Poor Excellent
Specific Gravity 0.97 (Floats) 1.38 (Sinks) 1.14 (Sinks) 0.91 (Floats) ~7.85 (Sinks)
Strength When Wet No Change No Change Reduced (10-15%) No Change Prone to Corrosion
Snap-Back Potential Very Low Medium Very High Medium High

This table clarifies the engineering compromises. Do you need the absolute highest strength in the smallest package? HMPE is the clear choice. Do you need to absorb significant dynamic energy from wave action? Nylon's high elongation is a benefit, but it comes with the grave risk of snap-back. Is budget the primary driver for a low-stakes application? Polypropylene might suffice. For a balanced, all-around performer with excellent durability, polyester remains a compelling option. The decision is an optimization problem, weighing safety, performance, handling, and cost to arrive at the best solution for a specific vessel and its operating environment.

2. Calculating Load Requirements: The Principle of Minimum Breaking Load (MBL)

The process of selecting a mooring rope for a marine vessel transcends a simple choice of material; it enters the realm of engineering calculation and risk assessment. The fundamental question that must be answered is: "How strong does this rope need to be?" Answering this requires a systematic approach grounded in established principles, the most important of which is the concept of Minimum Breaking Load (MBL). The MBL is the force, specified by the manufacturer, at which a new, dry rope will theoretically break when subjected to a straight-line static pull. It is not an average; it is a minimum guarantee. However, this single number is only the starting point. The true art and science of mooring line specification lie in determining the appropriate MBL for a particular vessel by considering its design, its intended operational environment, and a responsible margin of safety.

Defining Ship Design Minimum Breaking Load (MBLsd)

The cornerstone of modern mooring system design is the Ship Design Minimum Breaking Load (MBLsd). This value is not chosen arbitrarily; it is calculated by naval architects during the design phase of the vessel. The MBLsd represents the required MBL for the ship's standard mooring equipment, including its new, dry mooring ropes. The calculation is based on the vessel's Equipment Number (EN), a figure derived from the ship's profile area, displacement, and other dimensions, which quantifies the vessel's susceptibility to environmental forces like wind and current.

Guidance from classification societies and industry bodies like the Oil Companies International Marine Forum (OCIMF) provides the formulas to translate the EN into a specific MBLsd value, typically expressed in tonnes or kilonewtons. For example, the OCIMF's Mooring Equipment Guidelines, Fourth Edition (MEG4), provides a standardized methodology that has become the de facto global standard. This ensures that a vessel is equipped with lines that are fundamentally matched to its size and type. When a ship operator is replacing lines, the MBLsd specified in the vessel’s mooring system design manual is the primary reference point. Selecting a mooring rope for marine vessels with an MBL less than the MBLsd is a direct violation of the ship's design principles and introduces an unacceptable level of risk. This foundational requirement is as vital to the ship's integrity as ensuring that critical components like shackles or elevator links meet their own specified load ratings.

The Role of Environmental Factors: Wind, Current, and Waves

A ship moored at a berth is not a static object. It is a body in constant tension with its environment. Wind, current, and waves exert immense and often unpredictable forces on the hull. A proper load calculation must therefore account for these dynamic inputs. The MBLsd calculation provides a baseline, but the actual forces experienced by the mooring lines can vary dramatically depending on the specific conditions of the port and the weather.

Wind Load is a function of the wind speed squared and the vessel's exposed surface area (windage area). A 30-knot crosswind on a large container ship or LNG carrier can generate hundreds of tonnes of lateral force that must be counteracted by the mooring ropes.

Current Load is similarly related to the speed of the current squared and the vessel's underwater profile. A two-knot current might not sound like much, but the relentless pressure it applies to a large vessel's hull can be enormous. Tidal currents, river flows, and even localized eddies within a harbor all contribute to this load.

Wave Action, including swell and the wakes from passing vessels, introduces highly dynamic and cyclical loads. These shock loads are particularly challenging for a mooring system. The ropes must be able to absorb this energy without parting. This is where a material's elongation properties become critically important.

Sophisticated mooring analysis software can model these forces with a high degree of accuracy. These programs take into account the vessel's specific characteristics, the geometry of the mooring pattern (the angles and lengths of the lines), and site-specific environmental data to predict the tension on each individual line. For operators of large or high-value vessels, or for terminals in exposed locations, conducting such an analysis is not an option but a necessity for ensuring the safety of the operation.

Safety Factors and Working Load Limit (WLL)

The Minimum Breaking Load (MBL) is a measure of ultimate strength. A rope is never, under any circumstances, intended to be loaded to its MBL during operation. To ensure a margin of safety, the concept of Working Load Limit (WLL) is employed. The WLL is the maximum load that a rope should be subjected to during its operational life. It is calculated by dividing the MBL by a Safety Factor (SF).

WLL = MBL / SF

The choice of Safety Factor is not arbitrary. It depends on the application, the potential consequences of failure, and the level of risk. For general mooring operations, a typical safety factor for synthetic ropes is around 2:1 when considering the MBLsd against the vessel's design environmental loads. However, industry best practices, particularly those outlined in MEG4, have moved towards a more nuanced approach. MEG4 recommends that the WLL of a mooring line should not exceed 50-55% of the ship's MBLsd. This implicitly creates a safety factor of approximately 2.

This safety margin accounts for a multitude of real-world factors that can degrade a rope's strength over its life:

  • Wear and Abrasion: Friction against fairleads, chocks, or the quayside slowly severs external fibers.
  • UV Degradation: Sunlight breaks down the polymer chains, reducing strength over time.
  • Splicing and Knots: A well-made splice can retain 90-95% of a rope's strength, but knots can reduce it by as much as 50%.
  • Cyclic Loading Fatigue: Repeatedly loading and unloading a rope, even at levels well below its WLL, can cause fatigue damage over time.

The safety factor is a buffer, a deliberate over-specification to ensure that even a partially worn rope in a worst-case loading scenario still has sufficient residual strength to hold the vessel securely. It is the same principle applied to wire rope slings used in construction, where a safety factor of 5:1 or higher is standard to protect against dynamic loading and unseen damage.

Practical Tools and Software for Load Calculation

While the underlying principles are based in physics and engineering, modern mariners and port engineers have access to a range of tools that simplify and improve the accuracy of these calculations.

Mooring Calculators: Many rope manufacturers and maritime consultancies offer online or standalone software tools. These calculators allow users to input key parameters—vessel type, dimensions, wind speed, current speed, and mooring angles—and receive an estimate of the expected line tensions. These tools are invaluable for on-the-spot assessments and for planning mooring arrangements.

Advanced Mooring Analysis Software: For complex operations, such as STS (ship-to-ship) transfers or mooring at exposed offshore terminals, more powerful software is used. Programs like OPTIMOOR or ARIANE are capable of performing dynamic, time-domain simulations. They can model the vessel's six degrees of freedom of motion (surge, sway, heave, roll, pitch, yaw) and predict how the entire mooring system will respond to changing environmental forces over time. This level of analysis is crucial for identifying potential failure points and optimizing the mooring arrangement for maximum security.

Tension Monitoring Systems: An increasing number of modern vessels and terminals are being equipped with real-time tension monitoring hardware. Load cells or sensors are integrated into the mooring equipment, providing the bridge and terminal operators with a direct readout of the tension on each mooring rope for marine vessels. This transforms mooring from a reactive practice to a proactive one. Alarms can be set to trigger if any line approaches its WLL, allowing the crew to take corrective action—such as adjusting other lines or calling for a tug—before a dangerous situation develops. This data-driven approach represents the future of safe mooring.

3. Assessing Environmental Resistance: A Rope's Battle with the Elements

A mooring rope lives a harsh life. From the moment it is deployed, it is engaged in a relentless battle against the environment. The sun, the seawater, the chemicals in the harbor, the grit on the quay, and the constant friction of its own movement all conspire to degrade its strength and shorten its life. A comprehensive assessment of a mooring rope for marine vessels must therefore extend beyond its initial breaking strength to a thorough evaluation of its durability. The ability of a rope to resist these environmental onslaughts determines not only its long-term economic value but also its reliability as a piece of safety-critical equipment. A rope that weakens unpredictably in the sun or chafes through on a rough surface is a liability waiting to manifest as an incident.

Ultraviolet (UV) Degradation: The Unseen Threat

Of all the environmental challenges, ultraviolet radiation from the sun is perhaps the most insidious. Its effects are cumulative and often invisible until the damage is severe. UV radiation initiates a process called photo-oxidation in the polymer chains that form the rope's fibers. High-energy photons break the chemical bonds within the polymer, creating free radicals. These highly reactive molecules then trigger a chain reaction, leading to further bond scission and a reduction in the polymer's molecular weight. In practical terms, this means the fibers become weaker and more brittle.

Different materials exhibit vastly different levels of inherent UV resistance.

  • Polyester and HMPE are the champions in this regard. Their chemical structures are inherently more stable and less susceptible to attack by UV radiation. They are the preferred materials for applications involving prolonged sun exposure, such as permanent moorings in tropical regions.
  • Nylon has moderate UV resistance. It will degrade over time but at a slower rate than more susceptible materials.
  • Polypropylene is notoriously poor in its natural state. Unstabilized polypropylene can lose a significant percentage of its strength after only a few months of exposure to direct sunlight. For maritime use, PP ropes must be heavily treated with UV inhibitors and often feature protective pigments (like black carbon) to block the radiation.

Manufacturers can enhance UV resistance by adding stabilizers to the polymer blend during production. These additives work by absorbing or scattering the UV radiation or by "scavenging" the free radicals before they can cause widespread damage. When selecting a rope, it is not enough to know the base material; one must also inquire about the type and quantity of UV protection package included. A cheaper rope may simply have less of this vital protection, leading to a much shorter service life.

Chemical and Abrasion Resistance in Port Environments

Harbors are not pristine environments. They are complex chemical soups containing fuel, oil, hydraulic fluids, cleaning agents, and various industrial effluents. A mooring rope will inevitably come into contact with these substances. The ability of a rope's material to withstand chemical attack is therefore a key factor in its durability. Most synthetic fibers, including polyester, nylon, and HMPE, are generally resistant to damage from common hydrocarbons like oil and diesel. However, they can be vulnerable to strong acids and alkalis. Polyester, for example, is susceptible to degradation by strong alkaline solutions, while nylon can be weakened by strong acids. The rope's specifications should always be checked against the known chemical environment of its intended ports of call.

Abrasion is a more direct and mechanical form of damage. It occurs in two primary forms:

  • External Abrasion: This is the wear and tear caused by the rope rubbing against external surfaces. Rusty fairleads, rough concrete quays, and sharp edges on chocks can all act like files, slowly sawing through the rope's outer fibers. A rope with a tightly woven jacket or a specific anti-abrasion coating can significantly mitigate this type of damage.
  • Internal Abrasion: This occurs as the individual fibers and strands within the rope rub against each other under tension. As the rope stretches and relaxes, this internal friction can generate heat and cause microscopic damage to the fibers, leading to a gradual loss of strength from the inside out. Ropes with a firm, stable construction and specialized marine finishes that lubricate the fibers can reduce this internal friction.

The overall abrasion resistance is a combination of the material's inherent toughness and the rope's construction. Polyester is widely regarded as having excellent abrasion resistance. HMPE, while incredibly strong, can be more susceptible to cutting and abrasion if not properly protected. For this reason, high-performance HMPE ropes often incorporate a blended or composite jacket, perhaps made of polyester, to provide a tough, sacrificial outer layer that protects the load-bearing HMPE core. This is analogous to how a robust casing on a set of ratchet straps protects the webbing from cuts and friction.

Performance in Extreme Temperatures: From Arctic Cold to Tropical Heat

A vessel may operate in the freezing waters of the Arctic one month and the sweltering heat of the Persian Gulf the next. Its mooring ropes must be able to perform reliably across this entire temperature spectrum.

High Temperatures: Heat can affect ropes in two ways. First, it can cause a temporary reduction in strength. Most synthetic fibers will soften as they approach their melting point, leading to a decrease in their tensile strength. Polypropylene, with its low melting point (around 165°C), is particularly vulnerable. Friction on a winch drum can easily generate enough localized heat to melt or fuse PP fibers. Second, prolonged exposure to high ambient temperatures can accelerate other degradation processes, such as chemical and UV degradation. Dark-colored ropes will absorb more solar radiation and can reach surface temperatures significantly higher than the ambient air temperature, exacerbating this effect.

Low Temperatures: In cold climates, the primary concern is the rope becoming stiff and difficult to handle. Water absorbed by the rope can freeze, turning a flexible line into an unmanageable iron bar. This not only poses an ergonomic challenge for the crew but can also damage the rope's structure as ice crystals form between the fibers. Materials that absorb less water, like HMPE and polypropylene, generally perform better in freezing conditions than materials like nylon, which can absorb a significant amount of water. Some manufacturers offer special winterized or arctic versions of their ropes that are treated with coatings to reduce water absorption and maintain flexibility at low temperatures.

Water Absorption and Its Effect on Rope Properties

The interaction between a rope and water is a critical aspect of its performance. As mentioned, polypropylene and HMPE are hydrophobic (they repel water) and float. This is a significant handling advantage. Polyester absorbs very little water and its properties are largely unaffected when wet. Nylon, on the other hand, is hydrophilic (it absorbs water). A wet nylon rope can be 10-15% weaker than a dry one. This strength loss is temporary and is recovered when the rope dries, but it must be factored into any safety calculations for operations in wet conditions.

Water absorption also increases a rope's weight. A large-diameter nylon or polyester rope that has been submerged can become substantially heavier, making it more difficult and hazardous for the crew to handle. This added weight also increases the strain on winches and other mooring equipment. The choice of a mooring rope for marine vessels must therefore consider the typical operating conditions. For a vessel that frequently moors in rainy climates or engages in operations where lines are often in the water, a rope with low water absorption, such as one from a line of specialized marine vessel ropes, offers a distinct advantage in both safety and efficiency.

The environmental resilience of a mooring rope is a complex interplay of its material chemistry, its physical construction, and the specific hazards of its operational world. A thoughtful selection process looks beyond the data sheet's MBL and considers how that strength will be preserved over time in the face of sun, salt, chemicals, and mechanical wear.

4. Navigating Regulatory Compliance and Classification Society Standards

In the highly regulated world of commercial shipping, the selection and maintenance of a mooring rope for marine vessels is not left to the discretion of the shipowner alone. A web of international and national regulations, industry guidelines, and classification society rules governs every aspect of a vessel's equipment to ensure safety, protect the environment, and maintain operational integrity. Compliance is not optional. Failure to adhere to these standards can result in vessel detention by port state control, loss of insurance coverage, and, in the event of an incident, severe legal and financial liability. Understanding this regulatory landscape is as crucial as understanding the rope's material properties.

The Role of Classification Societies

Classification societies are non-governmental organizations that establish and maintain technical standards for the construction and operation of ships and offshore structures. Prominent societies include DNV (Det Norske Veritas), Lloyd's Register (LR), the American Bureau of Shipping (ABS), and ClassNK (Nippon Kaiji Kyokai). A vessel's "class" certification, issued by one of these societies, is essential for securing insurance and for trading in most parts of the world.

These societies publish detailed rules concerning all critical shipboard equipment, including mooring systems. Their rules specify the minimum requirements for the number and strength (MBL) of mooring lines a vessel must carry, based on its size and type (as determined by its Equipment Number). They also set standards for the design and arrangement of associated hardware, such as winches, chocks, and fairleads. When a new rope is brought on board, it must be accompanied by a certificate, typically issued by the manufacturer, that demonstrates it has been manufactured and tested in accordance with the standards of a recognized classification society. This certificate is a key document that will be reviewed during class surveys and port state control inspections. It provides a traceable link from the physical rope back to a certified manufacturing process, ensuring a baseline level of quality and performance. The process is similar to the certification required for industrial lifting slings or chains, where traceability and proven strength are paramount for safety.

Key International Standards: ISO, OCIMF, and MEG4 Guidelines

Beyond the rules of individual classification societies, several international standards provide more detailed guidance on the selection, use, and retirement of mooring ropes.

International Organization for Standardization (ISO): ISO develops and publishes a wide range of international standards, including several that are directly relevant to mooring ropes. For example, ISO 2307:2019 specifies methods for determining the physical and mechanical properties of fiber ropes, ensuring that when a manufacturer claims a certain MBL or elongation, it has been tested using a globally recognized and repeatable procedure. Other ISO standards cover terminology, splicing techniques, and specifications for different rope constructions.

Oil Companies International Marine Forum (OCIMF): OCIMF is a voluntary association of oil companies with an interest in the safe and environmentally responsible transport of crude oil and petroleum products. Through its publications, OCIMF has become one of the most influential bodies in setting best practices for shipping. Its Mooring Equipment Guidelines, Fourth Edition (MEG4), published in 2018, represents a landmark shift in the industry's approach to mooring safety.

MEG4 introduced several key concepts that are now widely adopted across all sectors of the shipping industry:

  • Mooring System Management Plan (MSMP): A vessel-specific plan that documents all mooring equipment, inspection and maintenance procedures, and risk assessments.
  • Line Management Plan (LMP): A component of the MSMP that details the history of each mooring line, including its date of manufacture, hours of use, and inspection records.
  • Standardized Testing Procedures: MEG4 emphasizes the need for consistent testing of ropes to understand how their properties change over their service life.
  • Focus on Human Factors: The guidelines place a strong emphasis on the safety of personnel involved in mooring operations, advocating for lighter, easier-to-handle ropes and greater awareness of risks like snap-back.

Compliance with MEG4 is now a requirement for vessels calling at most major oil and gas terminals, and its principles have been broadly embraced as best practice for all vessel types.

Documentation and Certification Requirements

Proper documentation is the backbone of regulatory compliance. When a vessel is inspected, the ship's officers must be able to produce a complete and up-to-date set of records for its mooring system. This documentation typically includes:

  • Manufacturer's Certificates: As mentioned, each rope must have a certificate that specifies its MBL, material, construction, length, diameter, and the standard to which it was produced. This certificate is the rope's "birth certificate."
  • Class Society Approval: The certificate should be endorsed or recognized by the vessel's classification society.
  • Mooring System Management Plan (MSMP) and Line Management Plan (LMP): These plans, mandated by MEG4, provide a living record of the entire mooring system. The LMP, in particular, tracks each individual rope from its installation to its retirement, documenting inspections, any observed damage, and periods of heavy use.
  • Inspection and Maintenance Logs: Regular, documented inspections are a requirement. These logs provide evidence that the crew is actively monitoring the condition of the ropes and taking them out of service when necessary.

Without this "paper trail," it is impossible to prove to an inspector or an auditor that the vessel is being operated safely and in accordance with applicable rules.

Regional Regulations and Port-Specific Requirements

While international standards provide a global framework, ship operators must also be aware of regional and local regulations. Some port authorities or terminal operators have their own specific requirements that may go beyond international norms. For example:

  • A terminal in an area with extreme weather conditions might require vessels to use a certain number of lines with a higher MBL than stipulated by their class society.
  • An environmentally sensitive area might have rules prohibiting the use of certain types of rope coatings.
  • Some ports may mandate the use of high-performance, low-stretch ropes (like HMPE) to enhance safety and efficiency at their berths.
  • Certain canals, like the Panama or Suez canals, have their own detailed regulations regarding the type, size, and condition of mooring lines that vessels must have ready for transit.

It is the responsibility of the ship's master and the operating company to research and comply with these local requirements before arriving at a port. This often involves communicating with the port agent or terminal well in advance of the vessel's arrival. The selection of a versatile mooring rope for marine vessels that meets the requirements of a wide range of global ports can simplify logistics and prevent costly delays.

5. Evaluating Ergonomics and Handling Safety for Crew

A mooring rope is more than just a line of engineered fibers with a specific breaking strength; it is a tool that must be handled by human beings, often in challenging and hazardous conditions. The ergonomic qualities of a rope—its weight, flexibility, and ease of use—have a direct and profound impact on the safety and well-being of the mooring crew. The industry's increasing focus on human factors, championed by guidelines like MEG4, recognizes that an overly heavy, stiff, or dangerous rope is not a good rope, regardless of its tensile strength. Evaluating a mooring rope for marine vessels from the perspective of the seafarers who must work with it every day is a critical component of a responsible selection process.

The Importance of Rope Weight and Flexibility

The physical effort required to perform mooring operations is immense. Hauling heavy lines from storage reels, passing them through chocks, and securing them on bollards is strenuous work. The weight of the rope is a primary determinant of this effort. Traditional steel wire ropes and large-diameter polyester or nylon ropes are incredibly heavy. A single 220-meter coil of large-diameter polyester rope can weigh over a tonne. Even with the aid of winches, the manual handling required at the beginning and end of the process is significant.

This is where the superior strength-to-weight ratio of high-performance fibers like HMPE offers a revolutionary safety benefit. An HMPE rope with the same MBL as a polyester rope can be less than half its diameter and a fraction of its weight. This dramatic weight reduction transforms the task of mooring.

  • Reduced Physical Strain: Lighter ropes are easier for the crew to carry, pull, and maneuver. This directly reduces the risk of musculoskeletal injuries, such as back strains and hernias, which are common among deck crews.
  • Increased Speed and Efficiency: Mooring operations can be completed more quickly and with fewer personnel. This is particularly valuable in ports with tight turnaround schedules.
  • Improved Safety in Difficult Conditions: Handling a lighter, more flexible rope on a wet, pitching deck in poor weather is inherently safer than wrestling with a heavy, waterlogged line.

Flexibility is also key. A rope that is supple and easy to handle is less likely to snag or kink. It is easier to coil, store, and pass through complex fairlead arrangements. The construction of the rope plays a significant role here. A well-balanced braided construction is often more flexible and resistant to kinking than a traditional twisted rope.

Snap-Back Zones: A Critical Safety Consideration

Perhaps the single greatest acute hazard in mooring operations is snap-back. When a rope under high tension parts, the stored energy is released instantaneously. Ropes with high elongation, particularly nylon, behave like massive rubber bands. They can recoil or "snap back" at speeds of several hundred miles per hour, capable of cutting through steel structures and causing fatal injuries. The area where a recoiling rope might strike is known as the snap-back zone.

The amount of energy stored in a rope is a function of its stiffness and its elongation. While all ropes under tension will exhibit some recoil, the violence of that recoil varies enormously between materials.

  • Nylon: With its high stretch, nylon stores the most energy and produces the most dangerous snap-back.
  • Polyester and Polypropylene: These materials have less stretch than nylon and therefore a less severe, but still very dangerous, snap-back potential.
  • Steel Wire: While it has very low stretch, its high mass means that a parting wire can also be thrown with lethal force.
  • HMPE: With its extremely low stretch (only 3-4% at break), HMPE stores very little elastic energy. If an HMPE rope parts, it tends to simply fall to the deck rather than whipping across it. This property is arguably one of the most significant safety advancements in mooring technology.

While selecting low-stretch ropes is the best engineering control, safe practice dictates that all personnel should be trained to identify and stay out of snap-back zones, regardless of the rope material being used. Painting snap-back zones on the deck is a common visual reminder of this ever-present danger. The principle is clear: reducing the stored energy in the system by choosing the right material is the most effective way to mitigate the risk.

Splicing, Inspection, and Maintenance Procedures

A rope is only as strong as its weakest point, and often that point is its termination. The method used to form an eye at the end of a rope for placing over a bollard is critical.

  • Knots: Tying a knot in a high-performance synthetic rope is strongly discouraged. A simple knot, like a bowline, can reduce the rope's strength by 50% or more. The tight bends in the knot create stress concentrations that severely weaken the fibers.
  • Splicing: An eye splice is the proper method for terminating a mooring rope. A well-executed splice, performed by a trained individual according to the manufacturer's instructions, can retain 90-95% of the rope's original strength. Different rope constructions (e.g., 8-strand, 12-strand braided) require different splicing techniques, and it is vital that the crew is trained in the correct procedure for the specific ropes they are using.

Regular inspection and maintenance are fundamental to ensuring ongoing safety. The crew must be trained to look for signs of damage, including:

  • External Abrasion: Cuts, chafing, and fused or glazed fibers.
  • Internal Wear: Often indicated by a powdery residue being pushed out from the rope's core.
  • UV Degradation: Discoloration and brittleness of the fibers.
  • Chemical Damage: Discoloration or softening of the rope material.
  • Kinks or Hockles: Permanent distortions in the rope's structure.

A robust Line Management Plan (LMP) requires that these inspections are conducted regularly and that the findings are logged. This creates a history for each rope, allowing for informed decisions about when it should be downgraded to a less critical application or retired from service completely.

Fatigue is a major contributing factor to workplace accidents in all industries, and maritime operations are no exception. The cumulative effect of long hours, irregular schedules, and physically demanding work can impair judgment and slow reaction times. The design of the mooring rope for marine vessels can either contribute to or help alleviate this fatigue.

A mooring operation that requires a large team to spend hours wrestling with heavy, stiff lines is a significant source of physical and mental fatigue. By the end of the process, the crew is exhausted, increasing the likelihood of mistakes during the final, critical stages of securing the vessel. Conversely, a system that uses lightweight, flexible, and easy-to-handle HMPE ropes reduces the physical workload, shortens the duration of the operation, and requires fewer personnel. This leaves the crew less fatigued and more alert. Investing in high-performance mooring solutions is therefore not just an investment in equipment; it is an investment in the resilience and well-being of the crew. This ergonomic consideration is just as important for mooring ropes as it is for other manually handled equipment, such as wire rope slings or portable ratchet straps, where user fatigue can directly lead to accidents.

6. Analyzing Long-Term Cost: Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)

A common mistake in procurement is to focus exclusively on the initial purchase price. For a long-lasting, critical asset like a mooring rope for marine vessels, this approach is short-sighted and can lead to higher expenses over the long term. A more sophisticated and strategically sound method is to evaluate the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO). TCO considers all costs associated with the rope over its entire service life, from acquisition to disposal. This holistic financial perspective often reveals that a higher-priced, premium rope can be the more economical choice. It requires a shift in mindset from viewing mooring lines as a consumable expense to seeing them as a long-term investment in safety, efficiency, and operational continuity.

Beyond Initial Purchase Price: Factoring in Lifespan

The initial cost of a set of mooring lines is only one part of the TCO equation. A cheap polypropylene rope may seem like a bargain, but if it needs to be replaced every one or two years due to UV degradation and mechanical damage, the cumulative cost quickly adds up. In contrast, a high-performance HMPE or a top-quality polyester rope, while carrying a significantly higher initial price tag, might have a service life of five, seven, or even more years.

The service life of a rope is determined by its resistance to the factors discussed previously: UV degradation, abrasion, chemical attack, and cyclic loading fatigue. Materials like HMPE and polyester, with their superior durability, naturally offer a longer lifespan. When you divide the initial cost by the number of years in service, the annual cost of the premium rope can be lower than that of the "cheaper" alternative.

For example, a polyester rope costing $10,000 with a 5-year life has an annual capital cost of $2,000. A polypropylene rope with a similar breaking strength might cost $4,000 but only last 2 years, giving it the same annual capital cost of $2,000, but with none of the performance or safety benefits. The HMPE rope might cost $25,000 but last 8 years, resulting in an annual cost of $3,125. While higher, this figure does not yet account for the other TCO factors that can tip the balance.

Maintenance, Repair, and Replacement Costs

The TCO must also include all the costs associated with keeping the ropes in service.

  • Inspection Costs: While all ropes require inspection, more durable ropes may require less frequent intensive examination, saving crew time.
  • Repair Costs: Splicing a damaged rope takes time and requires trained personnel. Ropes that are less prone to damage will incur lower repair costs over their life.
  • Replacement Logistics: The process of replacing a set of mooring lines is not trivial. It involves sourcing the new ropes, arranging for their delivery to a specific port, paying for crane services to lift the heavy coils onboard, and dedicating crew time to unspooling the old lines and installing the new ones. Conducting this entire process every two years instead of every seven years represents a significant operational cost and disruption.

Lighter ropes, such as those made from HMPE, can also reduce these associated costs. A coil of HMPE rope may be light enough to be handled without a crane, and the installation process is faster and requires fewer crew members, further reducing the total cost of each replacement cycle.

Cost Factor Low-Cost Rope (e.g., Polypropylene) High-Performance Rope (e.g., HMPE)
Initial Purchase Price Low High
Expected Service Life 1-2 Years 5-8+ Years
Annualized Capital Cost Moderate Moderate to High
Replacement Frequency High Low
Associated Labor/Logistics Costs High (due to frequency) Low (due to infrequency and ease of handling)
Operational Downtime Costs Higher Risk Lower Risk
Crew Injury Risk / Insurance Costs Higher Lower
Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Often Higher than expected Often Lower than initial price suggests

This table illustrates the TCO trade-off. The low initial price of a basic rope is often a false economy, negated by a short life and high recurring replacement costs.

The Economic Impact of Mooring Failures

The most significant, yet often overlooked, component of TCO is the cost of failure. A single mooring line parting can have catastrophic financial consequences that dwarf the initial cost of the entire set of ropes. These costs can include:

  • Vessel Damage: A vessel breaking free from its moorings can collide with the quay, other vessels, or port infrastructure like cranes and loading arms, causing millions of dollars in damage.
  • Port Disruption: A mooring incident can shut down a berth or even an entire terminal for hours or days, leading to massive demurrage costs and lost revenue for both the shipowner and the port.
  • Environmental Damage: If the vessel is a tanker, a mooring failure could lead to a pollution incident, resulting in enormous cleanup costs and fines.
  • Injury or Fatality: The cost of a snap-back incident that causes a serious injury or death is incalculable in human terms, but the subsequent legal claims, fines, and reputational damage can be financially crippling for a company.

Investing in a high-quality, reliable mooring rope for marine vessels is a form of insurance. The premium paid for a top-tier rope is a small price to pay to mitigate the risk of these low-probability, high-consequence events. When viewed through this lens, the decision to opt for the strongest, most durable, and safest rope available becomes a clear-headed business decision.

How High-Performance Ropes Can Reduce Operational Expenses

Beyond simply lasting longer and being safer, high-performance ropes can actively reduce a vessel's day-to-day operating expenses.

  • Fuel Savings: In certain applications, such as positioning for offshore loading, the use of lightweight HMPE lines instead of wires can reduce the overall weight of the vessel, leading to marginal but cumulative fuel savings.
  • Reduced Port Costs: Faster mooring operations, enabled by lightweight ropes, can reduce the time spent at berth, potentially lowering port fees. It can also reduce the need for tug assistance in certain situations, representing a direct cost saving.
  • Lower Crew Costs: Operations that can be performed safely with fewer personnel free up other crew members for other essential tasks. Over time, this increased efficiency can contribute to optimized crew manning levels.

The analysis of Total Cost of Ownership forces a shift from a purchasing department's spreadsheet to a fleet manager's strategic overview. It frames the choice of a mooring rope not as an expense to be minimized, but as an investment in operational resilience, safety, and long-term profitability.

7. Integrating Mooring Ropes with Onboard Equipment

A mooring rope does not function in isolation. It is one component in a complex, integrated system that includes the vessel's winches, capstans, bollards, fairleads, and chocks. The performance and longevity of the rope are deeply interconnected with the design and condition of this hardware. Selecting the perfect mooring rope for marine vessels is futile if the onboard equipment it interacts with is inappropriate or in poor condition. A systems-thinking approach is required, one that ensures the rope and the hardware work together in harmony, rather than in conflict. This synergy is essential for achieving both safety and the maximum possible service life from the mooring lines.

Compatibility with Winches, Capstans, and Bollards

The primary interface between the rope and the ship's machinery is the winch drum or capstan. Several compatibility factors must be considered:

  • Winch Type: Mooring winches are typically designed either for steel wire or for synthetic fiber ropes. Winches designed for wire often have a smaller drum diameter. Using a synthetic rope on a winch drum that is too small can force the rope to bend too sharply, creating excessive internal friction and heat, which can damage the fibers and significantly reduce the rope's strength and lifespan. The ratio of the drum diameter to the rope diameter (D/d ratio) is a critical parameter. Manufacturers provide minimum recommended D/d ratios for their ropes, and these must be respected.
  • Winch Brakes: The brake holding capacity of the winch must be correctly set. OCIMF's MEG4 guidelines recommend that the winch brake should be set to hold 60% of the ship's MBLsd. This is a critical safety feature. It ensures that in an extreme overload event, the brake will slip before the rope reaches its breaking point, providing a warning and preventing a catastrophic parting of the line. This setting must be regularly tested and certified.
  • Surface Condition: The surface of winch drums, capstans, and onboard bollards must be smooth and free from rust, old paint, and weld spatter. Any roughness will act as an abrasive, chafing and cutting the rope. A winch drum previously used for wire rope may have small, broken wire fragments embedded in its surface, which can be devastating to a new synthetic line. The drums must be thoroughly cleaned and prepared before new synthetic ropes are installed.

The Role of Fairleads and Chocks in Rope Longevity

Fairleads and chocks guide the rope from the winch on deck over the side of the ship toward the quay. They are points of high friction and stress concentration, and their condition is paramount to the health of the mooring rope.

  • Design and Size: Fairleads must be large enough to allow the rope to pass through without being compressed or bent at a sharp angle. As with winch drums, there is a minimum recommended radius for the surfaces the rope passes over. Using a large-diameter rope with a small, old-fashioned fairlead is a recipe for premature rope failure. The design should allow the rope to move freely in all anticipated directions without chafing against a sharp edge.
  • Surface Condition and Maintenance: The surfaces of all fairleads and chocks must be kept in perfect condition. They should be smooth, free of corrosion, and well-greased if they have moving parts like rollers. A rusty, grooved, or frozen roller is worse than a simple smooth surface, as it will concentrate wear in one spot. Regular inspection and maintenance of this hardware are just as important as the inspection of the ropes themselves. Any sharp edges must be ground smooth. The condition of these fittings is a primary focus for port state control and class surveyors for good reason—they are a direct indicator of the vessel's overall maintenance culture. The relationship between a rope and a fairlead is like that between a wire rope sling and the hook or shackle it is attached to; a poor interface will damage the line.

Matching Rope Diameter and Type to Existing Hardware

When replacing old ropes with new ones, especially when upgrading to a different material, it is not always possible to simply select a rope with the same MBL. If a vessel is switching from 60mm polyester ropes to HMPE ropes, the equivalent strength HMPE rope might only be 38mm in diameter. While this offers weight and handling benefits, it can create compatibility issues.

A much smaller diameter rope might not sit correctly on the winch drum, leading to poor spooling and potential damage. It may be too small for the grooves on the fairlead rollers, causing it to be pinched. In some cases, it may be necessary to either modify the existing hardware (e.g., by adding special sleeves to winch drums) or to select a slightly oversized HMPE rope to ensure a better fit, even if its MBL is higher than the minimum requirement. Alternatively, some manufacturers offer high-performance ropes with a custom-built, non-load-bearing jacket that increases the rope's diameter to match existing hardware while keeping the weight low. This systemic approach ensures that the investment in premium ropes is not wasted due to hardware incompatibility.

The Systemic Approach: Ropes as Part of a Larger Mooring System

Ultimately, it is crucial to stop thinking about individual components and to start thinking about the entire mooring system. This system includes the ropes, winches, brakes, fairleads, chocks, bollards, and even the training of the crew. Every part affects every other part. A failure in one component can lead to a cascading failure of the entire system.

This is why modern guidelines like MEG4 advocate for a holistic Mooring System Management Plan (MSMP). The MSMP forces the operator to consider the system as a whole. It requires an inventory of all equipment, a record of its purchase and certification, a schedule for inspection and maintenance, and procedures for its safe operation. When selecting a new mooring rope for marine vessels, the decision should be made within the context of the MSMP. Does the new rope's MBL match the vessel's MBLsd? Is its diameter compatible with the winches? Is its elongation characteristic suitable for the vessel's trade route? Does the crew have the correct training to splice and inspect this specific type of rope?

By adopting this integrated, systemic view, a ship operator can ensure that the mooring system is not just a collection of disparate parts, but a coherent and robust safety system designed to protect the vessel, its crew, and the environment.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

How often should mooring ropes be inspected?

Mooring ropes should undergo several levels of inspection. A visual inspection should be carried out by the crew before and after every use to check for obvious damage. More detailed inspections should be conducted on a regular schedule, typically monthly or quarterly, and the results should be recorded in the Line Management Plan (LMP). The frequency of detailed inspections may increase depending on how often the ropes are used and the conditions they are exposed to.

What is snap-back and how can it be prevented?

Snap-back is the violent, high-speed recoil of a mooring rope that parts under tension. It is caused by the instantaneous release of stored elastic energy. It can be extremely dangerous, causing severe injury or death. The best way to prevent it is to select ropes with very low stretch, such as those made from HMPE. Regardless of the rope type, all crew members must be trained to identify and stay clear of snap-back zones during mooring operations. Maintaining ropes in good condition and ensuring they are not overloaded also reduces the risk of parting.

Can different types of mooring ropes be used together?

It is highly discouraged to mix mooring ropes of different material types (e.g., polyester and nylon) in the same service (e.g., all as breast lines). Different materials have different elongation properties. When a high-stretch rope (nylon) is used alongside a low-stretch rope (polyester), the low-stretch rope will take up the majority of the load before the high-stretch rope can begin to share the tension effectively. This can lead to the low-stretch rope becoming overloaded and failing, which then causes a shock load on the other ropes, potentially leading to a cascading failure.

What is the typical lifespan of a mooring rope?

The lifespan of a mooring rope varies greatly depending on its material, quality of construction, usage frequency, environmental exposure (especially UV), and the quality of its maintenance. A cheap polypropylene rope might last only 1-2 years. A good quality polyester rope might last 5-7 years. A premium HMPE rope, if well-maintained, could last 7-10 years or even longer. OCIMF MEG4 recommends establishing a maximum service life, typically around 5 years, after which ropes should be retired unless a rigorous extension program is in place.

How does rope construction (e.g., braided vs. twisted) affect performance?

Rope construction has a significant impact on handling and performance. Twisted ropes (typically 3-strand) are simple to produce and easy to splice but are more prone to kinking and have lower strength efficiency. Braided ropes (e.g., 8-strand, 12-strand, or double-braid) are more stable, flexible, and resistant to kinking. A 12-strand single braid is common for high-performance HMPE ropes, offering a very high strength-to-weight ratio and easy inspection. Double-braided ropes (a braided core with a braided cover) offer good abrasion resistance.

What are the signs that a mooring rope needs to be retired?

A mooring rope should be retired from service if it shows signs of significant degradation. These signs include excessive external abrasion (more than 25% of outer fibers worn), cuts or tears, localized fusing or melting of fibers, chemical contamination, permanent kinking, or significant internal wear (indicated by a large amount of powder-like residue coming from within the rope). Any rope that has been shock-loaded should be carefully inspected and likely retired. The Line Management Plan (LMP) and manufacturer's retirement criteria are the primary guides.

Why are HMPE ropes more expensive but often more cost-effective?

HMPE ropes have a high initial purchase price due to the complex manufacturing process of the high-performance fibers. However, their total cost of ownership (TCO) is often lower. This is because they have a much longer service life, reducing replacement frequency. Their lightweight nature reduces handling time, requires fewer crew members for mooring, and lowers the risk of injuries, which can lead to significant cost savings in labor, insurance, and operational efficiency over the life of the rope.

Conclusion

The selection of a mooring rope for a marine vessel is a decision laden with consequence, extending far beyond simple procurement. It is a technical judgment that balances the principles of material science with the practical realities of maritime operations and the rigorous demands of international safety standards. The discourse has moved from a rudimentary focus on breaking strength to a sophisticated, multi-faceted analysis encompassing material durability, load dynamics, regulatory adherence, crew ergonomics, and a long-term economic perspective through the Total Cost of Ownership.

The evolution from natural fibers to advanced polymers like HMPE is not merely a story of technological progress; it is a narrative about the continuous pursuit of safety and efficiency. The modern mooring rope for marine vessels is an engineered safety device, where properties like low elongation are as valued as raw strength, and where resistance to UV radiation and abrasion are critical determinants of reliability. The implementation of frameworks like OCIMF's MEG4 has institutionalized a more intelligent and proactive approach, compelling operators to view mooring not as a series of isolated tasks but as the management of an integrated system. In this system, the rope, the winch, the fairlead, and the crew are all interconnected parts of a whole. A weakness in any one of these components compromises the integrity of the entire structure. Therefore, the choice of a mooring line is an investment in the resilience of this system, a commitment to the well-being of the crew, and a fundamental pillar in the safe and secure conduct of maritime commerce.

References

  1. Oil Companies International Marine Forum (OCIMF). (2018). Mooring equipment guidelines (MEG4). Witherby Publishing Group.
  2. International Organization for Standardization. (2019). Fibre ropes — Determination of physical and mechanical properties (ISO Standard No. 2307:2019). https://www.iso.org/standard/72373.html
  3. American Bureau of Shipping. (2022). Rules for building and classing steel vessels. ABS. https://ww2.eagle.org/en/rules-and-resources/rules-and-guides.html
  4. Chaplin, C. R., & Rebel, G. (2009). Rope in the deep ocean. Ocean Engineering, 36(12-13), 855–867.
  5. Flory, J. F. (2014). Mooring line management. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 228(4), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090213500858
  6. Hearle, J. W. S. (2000). High-performance fibres. Woodhead Publishing.
  7. Verreet, R. (2005). Properties and applications of high performance fibre ropes. Shaker Verlag.
  8. DNV. (2021). Position mooring (DNV-ST-0119).
  9. UK P&I Club. (2020). Risk focus: Mooring. https://www.ukpandi.com/news-and-resources/risk-focus/mooring/
  10. The Nautical Institute. (2015). Mooring and anchoring ships Vol. 1: Principles and practice.

Leave Your Message